| Home | About Us | Join | Meetings | Contact |

May 31, 2007



AFSA Study Finds Restrictions Would Deprive Many of Owning a Home
George Washington University Holds Forum on Mortgage Suitability Standard
Comment Letter Submitted on Model Privacy Form



Wells Fargo Announces Responsible Education Finance Principles and Marketing Practices





Mastercard Warning on Card Fee Cut
Card Rules Have Fed, Lawmakers Far Apart
Credit Card Interchange Fees Spark Disputes Among Small Business Merchants




Pipeline: Reverses Advance
Complaints Prompt Hard Look at Mortgage Telemarketing
'Subprime' Aftermath: Losing the Family Home
Fed to Mull Loan Rulemaking
Hill Weighs FHA Lifeline to Pressed Borrowers
Tax ID Debate Emerges




Schumer Denounces Rent-to-own Industry
Advocates Worry Immigrants Will Fall Prey to Loan Sharks
Reforms? Not for Rates on Private Student Loans
Another Tough Payday for the Military




NABD Shares Industry Benchmarks
Finance Express Purchases Tracker Dealer Management System





AFSA Study Finds Restrictions Would Deprive Many of Owning a Home

On Tuesday, AFSA released a new study that found that more restrictive mortgage regulation would deny credit not only to those who would actually experience a foreclosure, but also to the whole class of borrowers. The study, conducted by the Center for Statistical Research (CSR), found that new mortgage laws that restrict access to certain loans would be an overreaction to the current foreclosure situation and would deprive hundreds of thousands of Americans the opportunity to own their own homes.

To see the AFSA press release on the study, go to:
www.afsaonline.org/sitepages/docs/ForeclosuresStudyMay2007.pdf
Back to Top

George Washington University Holds Forum on Mortgage Suitability Standard

On May 21, AFSA staff participated in a policy forum sponsored by the Financial Services Research Program at George Washington University. It asked the question: "Is New Regulation Needed to Protect Consumers from Unsuitable Mortgage Loans?" Among the panelists was Drexel University's Joe Mason, who identified the problem as a multidimensional issue. He noted that lenders need to take responsibility for software platforms that are abused by some brokers. Overeager borrowers were not exempt from criticism either. He noted that consumers base their decisions on payment and not on disclosures, as shown by recent consumer surveys conducted by the Federal Reserve.

Patricia McCoy, a law professor with the University of Connecticut and a long-time advocate of a suitability standard, tempered her position by signaling that such a standard would have to be based on objective criteria that the industry could rely on. The panelists also discussed compensation incentives for mortgage brokers as a critical factor in the current environment of rising foreclosures.


Back to Top

Comment Letter Submitted on Model Privacy Form

AFSA worked with the National Coalition for E-Commerce and Privacy to help craft and submit the coalition's comment letter on the proposed "Model Privacy Form" under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. On May 29, the Coalition submitted its comments to the Federal Trade Commission as well as a number of other federal agencies.

In its letter, the coalition commented on a number of fundamental issues about privacy disclosures, including:
  • Whether the voluntary nature of the Model Form is sufficiently clear—particularly in light of the rescission of the sample clauses.
  • Whether the Model Form enables an institution to describe its privacy policy accurately.
  • Whether the array of format requirements is unduly burdensome.
  • Whether a complex institution can develop and use a single, organization-wide disclosure notice.

Additionally, the coalition provided comments on the proposed rule covering the use of Social Security numbers in effecting opt-outs and on Web-based forms. Back to Top





Wells Fargo Announces Responsible Education Finance Principles and Marketing Practices
Wells Fargo News Release (05/29/07)

Wells Fargo has published its Responsible Lending Principles and Marketing Practices for Education Financing, publicly unveiling its business policies for student lending. A copy of the publication is accessible online, and includes information about responsible lending practices as well as the company's marketing practices for education finance with its school partners. Wells Fargo has pledged to promote responsible borrowing by encouraging students to consider all education financing options available to them and borrow only what they need, offer attractive financing solutions--which include competitive interest rates and other incentives--and provide consumers with full disclosure about loan options and costs on its Web site. The company also pledged not to enter into revenue-sharing agreements and "school as lender" programs with schools, give items of any value in exchange for special considerations by schools, or compensate lender advisory councils including reimbursement for lodging and travel to meetings. It has further promised not to arrange or agree to provide "opportunity loans," or private loans to borrowers who would not otherwise satisfy Wells Fargo's credit criteria in exchange for additional federally guaranteed loan volume. It will also not provide staff or assist with call center or financial aid office staffing.
Back to Top






Mastercard Warning on Card Fee Cut
The Australian (05/31/07) P. 23; Jimenez, Katherine

In light of the Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA's) potential to eliminate interchange fees altogether, Mastercard Australia has announced that a zero interchange policy could result in its termination of card issuance. With backing from the Australian Bankers Association, the RBA is seeking industry input on the proposal set to cut interchange fees for credit cards, eftpos, and debit cards. Mastercard Australia Corporate Affairs Vice President Albert Naffah said, "any move to go down to zero would again be borne entirely by Australian consumers." Naffah added that the RBA has instated a "burden ... on Australian consumers" and that its efforts should be focused on redressing that issue, because lower interchange fees have resulted in the erosion of rewards programs and shorter interest-free terms on cards.
Back to Top

Card Rules Have Fed, Lawmakers Far Apart
American Banker (05/29/07) Adler, Joe

Though the Federal Reserve Board last week proposed a broad shakeup of disclosures for credit cards, a wide gulf remains between the central bank's plan and more sweeping changes sought by several lawmakers. Under the Fed plan, credit card issuers could continue to use many existing practices that have come under fire on Capitol Hill, including so-called universal default and double-cycle billing, but they would be forced to explain them better. Lawmakers, however, are seeking to ban most of these practices outright. The result is a proposal that industry representatives are already signaling they believe is onerous, while lawmakers dismiss it as not tough enough. The Fed's proposal, issued Wednesday, would require issuers to beef up disclosures on several fronts, including substantial editing of monthly statements and giving customers at least 45 days notice before hiking interest rates or making other changes. Legislation from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee's financial institutions subcommittee, meanwhile, would ban fees for certain card payment methods, including electronic funds transfers. A broad bill introduced in March by Reps. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) would prohibit penalties for on-time payments and over-the-limit fees for approved purchases, among other changes.
Back to Top

Credit Card Interchange Fees Spark Disputes Among Small Business Merchants
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (05/27/07) Leonard, Kim

With interchange fees rising, merchants are increasingly putting pressure on state and federal governments to take action on the issue. The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee is planning to hold a hearing on interchange practices sometime this year. Meanwhile, the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs committee is considering examining the issue as part of a look at alleged abusive practices in the credit card industry. At the state level, legislation has been introduced in nine states to control interchange fees or disclose what the fees are paying for, according to the Merchants Payment Coalition. However, some merchants are not challenging interchange fees because they see them as a necessary business expense. Consumers also appear to be indifferent to the issue of interchange fees. Though a new survey by Javelin Strategy and Research found that most consumers know about interchange fees and believe they affect prices, most say they will not stop using plastic to lower a merchant's costs.
Back to Top




Pipeline: Reverses Advance
American Banker (05/31/07) P. 9; Launder, William

Nationwide, many lenders have begun offering fixed rates on reverse mortgages--which enable homeowners 62 and older to convert some of their home equity into a cash payment. Florida-based Value Financial Mortgage Services Inc. last week announced that its fixed-rate product would be set under 7 percent, while Borba Investments Inc. of California's MLS Reverse Mortgage is allowing eligible homeowners to lock in at a rate of 6.5 percent. While most reverse loans carry an adjustable rate of about 5.86 percent, Borba President and CEO Mike Borba says borrowers who take out fixed products will have access to the money in a lump sum, whereas adjustable borrowers usually receive monthly payments. Additionally, Borba describes the reverse mortgage market as evolving "tremendously" and "so quickly" that lower rates may be possible in the future.
Back to Top

Complaints Prompt Hard Look at Mortgage Telemarketing
Boston Herald (05/30/07)

Lawmakers and regulators across the country are looking to reign in "trigger leads," the alerts that credit reporting bureaus sell to lenders when a loan officer pulls the credit file of a consumer. Minnesota's governor blocked most trigger leads last week, a ban is pending in Massachusetts, and a few other states and the House Financial Services Committee are looking at the issue--or plan to. The National Association of Mortgage Brokers does not officially sanction trigger leads; but Harry Dinham, president of the group, says a ban on the practice is overzealous and suggests instead that leads could be sold just to consumers who want to receive calls of better mortgage deals from telemarketers. The credit reporting agencies, meanwhile, say trigger leads foster competition and can lower rates.
Back to Top

'Subprime' Aftermath: Losing the Family Home
Wall Street Journal (05/30/07) P. A1; Whitehouse, Mark

Coverage of America's subprime lending problems to date has trained largely on the slowdown in formerly overheated housing markets like Florida and California, but the troublesome trend also is having a broad impact in some of the country's less wealthy and more distressed local economies. Detroit, where First American Loan Performance reports that subprime investors pumped more than $1 billion dollars into 22 neighborhoods last year, is a prime example; others include Memphis, Tenn., and Newark, N.J. While the infusion of home-buying dollars helped raise the rate of ownership in such previously underserved communities, many of them predominately minority, it also may have encouraged people to assume financial obligations they could not meet. A wave of defaults among these lower- and middle-income borrowers now has some observers convinced that subprime lending ultimately could wipe out more homeowners than it helped to create while also agitating the national economy.
Back to Top

Fed to Mull Loan Rulemaking
American Banker (05/30/07) P. 4; Sloan, Steven

In response to pressure from Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and other Democratic lawmakers, the Federal Reserve will hold a hearing on June 14 regarding possible rules to curtail predatory lending. The session will center on whether the rules should cover such issues as prepayment penalties, escrow accounts on subprime loans, stated-income mortgages, low-documentation loans, and borrowers' repayment ability. Dodd insists the central bank has a responsibility to curb abusive loan practices under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), but Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke contends that it must tread carefully. According to Bernanke, "Because borrowers can file private lawsuits to obtain remedies for violations of HOEPA rules, any new rules should also be crafted in a manner that avoids creating uncertainty regarding lender compliance."
Back to Top

Hill Weighs FHA Lifeline to Pressed Borrowers
Baltimore Sun (05/25/07) Harney, Ken

A bill approved by the House Financial Services Committee to reform the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program will be considered by the full House next month; and following a rejection of a similar measure by the Senate in 2006, it is unclear whether lawmakers there will lend their approval now that many subprime borrowers are facing higher monthly payments and possible foreclosure. The proposal would increase the maximum loan amount in pricey housing markets, eliminate down payments for certain borrowers, expand homeownership counseling programs, and impose risk-based insurance premiums. Additionally, it would make it easier for struggling subprime borrowers to refinance into fixed-rate mortgages with lower interest rates; and already, applications are on the rise. However, several Republicans are opposed to the bill, particularly a provision that would put some of the agency's profits toward counseling costs, technology upgrades, and an affordable-housing fund--the latter of which has them worried the money will be given to risky borrowers who cannot afford homeownership.
Back to Top

Tax ID Debate Emerges
Builder (05/07) Vol. 30, No. 7, P. 51; Zurier, Steve

Legislation proposed by Rep. John Doolittle (R-Calif.) would put a stop to the use of Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) from the Internal Revenue Service as a way to obtain mortgages for primary residences. The bill, which requires all borrowers to provide a social security number, primarily targets illegal Hispanic immigrants; and real estate professionals worry that it could have a huge impact on the housing market. National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals President and CEO Tim Sandos says the law would prevent undocumented immigrants in the process of obtaining citizenship from achieving homeownership, even if their status has been disclosed to the government. According to the organization, implementing the bill would result in the loss of $44 billion in mortgages. CityView Chairman and former HUD secretary Henry Cisneros is concerned, meanwhile, that the legislation would put a damper on revitalization efforts in urban communities; and Tampa Bay Builders Association Executive Vice President Joseph Narkiewicz worries about the impact it would have on foreign retirees, inquiring whether "they have to apply for a social security number or maintain dual citizenship to own a primary residence in this country?" The bill is expected to be considered in the coming months when lawmakers turn to immigration reform measures.
Back to Top




Schumer Denounces Rent-to-own Industry
Buffalo News (05/30/07) Epstein, Jonathan D.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has proposed federal legislation to curb practices and cap prices in the rent-to-own industry, which Schumer describes as predatory and unethical. Schumer asserts that the industry forces needy, uninformed customers to pay excessive prices for household items like air conditioners and refrigerators. Schumer's Rent-to-Own Reform Act of 2007 would require companies to divulge comprehensive information regarding prices, fees, services, and percentage rates. In addition, the act would cap finance charges and other such payments at state interest rate ceilings. New York, for example, deems anything above 25 percent interest "criminally usurious," whereas rent-to-own markups over suggested retail prices can reach 200 percent. The act would also work to prevent price inflation, and would make all rent-to-own transactions subject to other federal acts, like the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Moreover, the act would enable customers to end their contracts at any point in time.
Back to Top

Advocates Worry Immigrants Will Fall Prey to Loan Sharks
Associated Press (05/29/07) Dell'Orto, Giovanna

Legislation currently before Congress would require illegal immigrants to pay $5,000 in fines, in addition to fees and back taxes, to obtain a visa that would give them legal status. Because so many immigrants earn very low wages, many would likely have to rely on loans to meet these expenses. As a result, immigrants' advocacy groups are concerned that predatory lenders would target immigrants trying to pay the fines by charging exorbitant interest rates and lending fees. In addition, many illegal immigrants do not have checking or savings accounts, which makes traditional lending institutions such as banks less accessible to them; advocates are also concerned that service providers may charge exorbitant fees for related expenses such as ensuring that the paperwork for the process is complete or wiring the necessary money. However, many financial institutions have expressed an interest in helping immigrants with the fee. Banking consultant Rick Fischer of Morrison & Forester says, "The financial institutions are really interested in this, as this is probably the single largest untapped market" in the country.
Back to Top

Reforms? Not for Rates on Private Student Loans
USA Today (05/29/07) P. 1B; Chu, Kathy; Block, Sandra

Although proposals to reform the student-loan process are common in Congress and among consumer-advocacy groups, most of these proposals would affect only federal loans, which are partially subsidized by the federal government and generally have borrowing limits as well as caps on the maximum rate that can be charged. However, much of the debt carried by financially struggling students now comes from private loans, which have no such limits, and which Congress has been reluctant to regulate, with members arguing that legislators have jurisdiction only over federal loans. Because private loans are often variable-rate, rates can skyrocket to up to 20 percent quickly, making it difficult or impossible for students to pay off the loans fast enough to keep the debt from perpetually growing. In addition, Congress has not raised the maximum students can borrow in federal loans since 1992, although college tuition has increased exponentially since then. Many students are also unaware of the amount they can borrow in federal loans and thus pay for more of their education than necessary with private loans; this problem is exacerbated by the fact that agreements between colleges and lenders often allow lenders to be put on colleges' lists of preferred lenders for both federal and private loans, but they then aggressively market only their private loans.
Back to Top

Another Tough Payday for the Military
Motley Fool (05/24/07) Duprey, Rich

In attacking payday lenders, the government is failing to address a fundamental economic problem, which is that military personnel are underpaid. The "pay gap" between civilians and the military is roughly 4 percent, according to government statistics. Staff sergeants with six years of experience earn less than $30,000 a year, according to the Army's Web site. Congress is contemplating bills that would increase military compensation by either 3 percent or 3.5 percent. But legislators have already removed a financial resource used by 20 percent of military personnel: payday lenders. In what is essentially an attempt to outlaw military payday loans entirely, Congress passed a bill holding payday loans' interest rates at 36 percent. The nation's biggest payday lender, Advance America, stopped offering loans to service members in response, cutting off many military personnel from a valuable source of financial assistance.
Back to Top




NABD Shares Industry Benchmarks
SubPrime Auto Finance News (05/24/2007) Reed, Jennifer

The National Alliance of Buy-Here, Pay-Here Dealers Conference included a discussion of some of the economic problems facing the subprime automobile loan market, as well as benchmark data for subprime car loan dealers' expenses. Last year saw a number of trends that made the subprime auto market more challenging, including higher costs for vehicle acquisitions, a larger number of debt chargeoffs, and inflationary pressures. As a result, gross profits declined; therefore, subprime auto financers interested in being profitable need to take action to reduce expenses related to bad debt. Technology to improve operating efficiency may be helpful to reduce overall expenses, but bad-debt related problems must be addressed through more careful underwriting and more diligent collections. In addition, down payments and monthly payments may need to be increased as a result of inflation. This may lead to fewer customers taking on debt they cannot afford.
Back to Top

Finance Express Purchases Tracker Dealer Management System
Auto Channel (05/24/07)

Finance Express has bought the Tracker Dealer Management System from Manheim, and will offer the Web-based tool to all Tracker dealers. Under the terms of the sale, Manheim will offer the same services that Tracker provided, such as the capacity to hunt for particular makes and models within the Manheim system and to receive updated pricing reports. The Finance Express DMS System has payments and collections features, as well as integration with accounting software, says Gordon Warren, vice president of Tracker. Ralph Liniado, Manheim's senior vice president of business development, notes that "Finance Express' expertise in developing and maintaining leading-edge software applications for dealers will greatly benefit the independent dealer market."
Back to Top



Abstract News © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION INC.

In This Issue:















AFSA Newsbriefs is a weekly executive summary of AFSA initiatives and consumer credit articles. For more information,
please contact newsbriefs@afsamail.org.


AFSA's mission is to protect and improve the consumer credit business, maintain a positive public image, and create a legislative climate in which reasonable credit regulation can and will be enacted. The Association operates in the public interest, encourages and maintains ethical business practices, supports financial education for consumers of all ages, and provides other assistance in related fields on an as-needed basis.

The American Financial Services Association has provided services to its members for over ninety years. The Association's officers, board, and staff are dedicated to continuing this impressive legacy of commitment through the addition of new members and programs, and increasing the quality of existing services.

© 2007 American Financial Services Association
919 Eighteenth Street, NW • Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006-5517